¿La clave para una organización realmente centrada en el cliente? Los datos
La anticipación suele ser fundamental en poder fomentar una cultura centrada en el cliente. Las empresas que utilizan una estrategia client centric a menudo pueden prever cada deseo, necesidad y posible capricho de su público objetivo, y encontrarse generosamente recompensadas en el proceso. Poner al cliente en primer plano, incluso por encima de los ingresos, puede hacer que una empresa sea un 60% más rentable. No es una mala propuesta para cuidar bien uno de los activos más esenciales de una organización.
Por supuesto, afirmar ser una empresa centrado en el cliente clientes más fácil decir que ejecutar. Las empresas que lo hacen con éxito a menudo utilizan un método diferente de pensamiento para lograr sus resultados: responden a las preguntas “quién-qué-por qué”. Utilizando estas tres preguntas, cada empleado puede entender mejor al cliente más allá de las simples características demográficas. Una comprensión más profunda luego ayuda tomar decisiones informadas, da forma a la experiencia en todos los posibles puntos de contacto y permite una orientación más reflexiva y significativa.
Con este método, los empleados hacen que los clientes se sientan vistos y escuchados. Los clientes ven a la empresa en la que eligieron confiar cumpliendo activamente con sus deseos y necesidades. Tales servicios básicos pueden hacer maravillas por la lealtad a la marca y la defensa de la marca. También puede animar a los consumidores a dedicar una parte más grande de sus billeteras, alrededor de un 3% a un 20% más.
En una sociedad acelerada, las empresas siempre deben buscar la manera más beneficiosa de apelar a los clientes y retener la lealtad. Una estrategia centrada en el cliente es el primer paso, aunque se necesita una comprensión más profunda de los deseos, necesidades y preferencias de del cliente y comunicarlas para obtener resultados tangibles. Esto plantea la pregunta: ¿Cómo se llega exactamente a una comprensión más profunda de un público objetivo?
Entendiendo al público objetivo
Las empresas suelen utilizar cuatro métodos específicos para captar hallazgos del consumidor y anticipar mejor los deseos y necesidades de los clientes. El primero es la observación naturalista, que monitorea las interacciones de las personas con el mundo. Estos hallazgos pueden ofrecer ideas sobre cómo un público objetivo podría intentar satisfacer un deseo o necesidad única. El segundo son las encuestas a los clientes que permiten a las organizaciones recopilar comentarios valiosos. El tercero son los grupos focales, que involucran a los clientes discutiendo productos o servicios.
Los datos son la cuarta estrategia. A diferencia de los otros, este método es donde las empresas están experimentando actualmente el mayor cambio. La computación en la nube ha llevado a replantear las actividades orientadas a la comprensión del cliente, como la analítica de servicio al cliente, la experiencia de marca, el marketing en redes sociales y las herramientas de voz del cliente.
Las nuevas opciones y sistemas pueden abrumar fácilmente a cualquiera que busque los datos correctos para implementar una estrategia enfocada en el cliente. Comenzar con un número limitado de métricas y expandirse desde allí puede ahorrar tiempo, dinero y problemas. Aquí es donde deben dirigir la atención primero:
1. Experiencia de marca
Seguir la experiencia de marca puede ayudar a capturar el sentimiento del consumidor sobre su marca. Da una mejor idea de lo que las personas piensan y sienten acerca de sus servicios. Si se hace bien, el seguimiento de la experiencia de marca puede dar luz a las iniciativas de la marca que funcionan o no, lo que permite redirigir los esfuerzos rápidamente. Tanto el puntaje neto de promotores como la satisfacción del cliente pueden ayudar a cristalizar lo que los consumidores podrían estar diciendo y pensando sobre su marca.
Las encuestas también pueden ser una gran fuente de información. Mantener las preguntas al mínimo y orientadas para fomentar una participación más completa. Además, asegurarse de no bombardear a los consumidores con cuestionarios. Una buena frecuencia para captar tales sentimientos puede ser trimestralmente. Entender las mentalidades de sus consumidores los anima a confiar en su marca y a seguir volviendo por más.
2. Experiencia del cliente
El seguimiento de la experiencia del cliente implica comprender las diferentes dimensiones del deleite del cliente, incluidas las reacciones emocionales y racionales a las ofertas de una empresa. También proporciona información sobre la inclinación del cliente a volver a comprar, recomendar o rechazar un producto o servicio en el futuro.
Usando ciertos conjuntos de datos, particularmente aquellos asociados con las interacciones, transacciones y perfiles de los clientes, puede llegar a lo que McKinsey & Company llama “perspectiva predictiva”. Esto puede ayudar a dar forma a la experiencia del cliente en el futuro. Todo lo que se necesita son algoritmos de aprendizaje automático para dar sentido a la información y dirigir fondos hacia ciertos puntos de contacto más propensos a impulsar el comportamiento a lo largo del viaje del cliente.
3. Alineación de empleados
En una organización centrada en el cliente, cada persona comparte el objetivo de crear una gran experiencia del cliente, desde los ejecutives hasta los asociados de primera línea. El seguimiento y la medición de la alineación de los empleados, o AE, le darán una mejor idea de qué tan bien cada miembro del equipo comprende a los clientes y, lo que es más importante, cree que entender y satisfacer las necesidades del cliente son fundamentales para el éxito de la empresa y el suyo propio.
AE comienza con un sentido de camaradería y pertenencia. Una encuesta de Deloitte encontró que el 79% de los empleados tienden a estar de acuerdo. Además, el 93% cree que es un factor que impulsa el rendimiento organizacional. Cuando los empleados pueden ver un objetivo común, es más probable que lo alcancen para el éxito de todos los involucrados.
Como con cualquier iniciativa relacionada con el cliente, todo se reduce a los datos. Los pasos más importantes son monitorear el sentimiento del cliente y comprender dónde puede ubicarse su empresa dentro de sus decisiones de compra. Simplemente aprecie que un movimiento incorrecto puede hacer que las personas busquen alternativas a sus servicios. Los clientes quieren lo que quieren cuando lo quieren. Al centrarse en una estrategia comercial centrada en el cliente, puede asegurarse de que lo obtengan y sigan regresando por más
Related content
Related content
There’s a specific kind of strategy meeting getting scheduled right now, in nice hotels with bad coffee: the AI reset off-site.
And for good reason. In a 2026 WRITER survey, 48% of leaders described their AI rollout as, in their own words, a "massive disappointment." That's nearly half the room.
What that number really measures is the distance between what these tools can do and what people are doing with them. In our experience, that distance is almost entirely human.
Which is why the off-site is the right instinct. Making the most of that time is the harder part.
What separates an AI reset that actually changes the game from an expensive two-day conversation? In our experience, it comes down to avoiding four common design mistakes.
Mistake 1
Blaming the bots
The gap between AI investment and real adoption is almost always about people, not technology. And when adoption stalls, we usually find it's one of four things.
- They don't think it will help them
- Nobody around them is using it
- They don't feel capable
- Or they don't have real access to the tools they were promised
Four different problems, and four completely different fixes.
That's why diagnosis comes first. If you don't know which barrier you're dealing with, every intervention becomes an educated guess. And you cannot tell which one you have by staring at a dashboard. A belief gap and a skill gap look identical in a status report and need opposite interventions. Show up guessing, and you'll spend real money teaching people to use a tool they simply don't trust yet. Congratulations - you've just catered the wrong conversation.
Mistake 2
Letting leaders off the hook
One of the biggest predictors of whether change sticks is also one of the most overlooked: leadership.
If your executives show up as observers, nodding along and quietly answering email under the table, your people clock it in about four minutes.
That doesn't mean your CEO has to emcee the thing. It means they use the tools in front of everyone, participate in the conversation, and make it clear this isn't someone else's initiative.
Recently we’ve been working with a Fortune 200 global professional services firm who’s top 120 leaders were at very different points with AI. Some were redesigning entire processes. Others were using it to summarize emails, or not at all. Rather than focus on the technology, the four-hour session focused on what leaders could do with AI, applying it to a live strategic challenge and ending with a personal commitment to lead differently. The response was strong enough that the organization is now cascading the experience globally.
The lesson is simple: when leaders experience AI as a strategic capability, they're better equipped to model the behavior that makes adoption stick. Nothing you build during those two days survives without that entire chain of leadership doing its part.
Mistake 3
Chasing the wrong outcome
Without a behavioral baseline, you have no way to prove anything actually moved. No baseline, no ROI. You're just hoping the energy in the room was good, which is a wonderful feeling and a terrible metric to bring to your CFO.
But the baseline isn't just about proving the off-site worked. It's about understanding where you're starting in the first place. And you'll want that clarity, because the quiet resistance is real. In that same 2026 research, nearly a third of employees admitted to actively working around their company's AI strategy. If you don't win their belief in the room, some of them will keep politely ignoring the whole thing from their desks. You can't measure your way out of that. You have to earn your way out of it.
Which brings us to the biggest reframe of all.
Mistake 4
Leaving follow-through to chance
We've been working with a Fortune 100 medical device company on their AI strategy for three years. It started with their leadership team, a three-hour session built around what those leaders would do differently, and it landed. What became clear afterward was that the same experience needed to happen everywhere else. So, it expanded: 90-minute activations for 15,000 people, and this year intact teams redesigning their own workflows.
Three years in, that first session is the smallest part of the story.
Your event is where momentum gets created. What happens at 30, 60, and 90 days is where results get made.
If you're planning one of these and want to change what happens on Monday, not just how everyone feels on Friday, that the work we do.
We'd be glad to help you design it.
Candidates now arrive at interviews pre-coached by AI, with their resumes optimized to pass every checkpoint. Polish has stopped being a signal. The traditional hiring process was built to read exactly the cues that AI is now best at producing, and the signals hiring managers once relied on have weakened as a result. And for roles where the wrong hire carries real business consequences, losing the ability to tell who will actually perform is not a minor inconvenience. It is a material risk, and it exposes the business to unnecessary turnover, reduced performance, and heavier investment for talent growth and development.
So how do you observe the behaviors that matter most, before someone is in the role?
Not by asking better questions, but rather by putting candidates in situations designed to elicit that behavior.
The limits of predicting from paper
Credentials tell you what someone has done. Structured interviews tell you what someone says they would do. Neither lets you observe what they actually do in the moments that count.
This distinction matters most in client-facing, relationship-driven roles, where the performance gap between a strong hire and a weak one plays out in real business outcomes (revenue, retention, client growth). Organizations that hire at scale in these roles carry that gap across hundreds of decisions at a time.
The better approach is to watch candidates do the work before you hire them. Put them in simulated, role-relevant scenarios, and pair the simulation with a second, different kind of measure so no single method carries the whole decision. That combination is what lets you evaluate real performance before anyone is in the role. Organization-specific simulations provide a clear read on who is ready and capable of performing on day one. In a world of AI-supported candidate signals, the use of simulations makes the process harder to prep for. It is harder to fake. And, when designed well, it is substantially more predictive than other hiring methods.
What counts as evidence
Claims about predictive power are easy to make. Evidence for them is rarer than you would expect.
A predictive validity study, the kind that links pre-hire assessment scores to how someone actually performs once hired, is some of the hardest evidence to produce and the rarest to see. Many assessments are validated against proxies: another test, or a theoretical model of the role, rather than real results on the job. Connecting scores to concrete business outcomes and doing the statistical work to show the link holds, takes years of shared data and a level of commitment from both the assessment provider and the client that most partnerships never reach. That is precisely why it is worth asking for. A provider who can show how assessment scores track to training completion, retention, and first-year output is offering something categorically different from one who can only show a correlation with another test.
Why simulation holds up where other methods do not
When a candidate sits across from a trained assessor (someone playing the client or prospect on the other side of the conversation) and has to work through a real situation, they cannot rely on a rehearsed answer. The scenario is specific. The stakes feel real. What you see is close to what you would get on the job.
That is the value of simulation-based assessment: it does not test what candidates know about the role.
It shows how they use what they know when a real person is on the other side of the conversation, before the stakes are real.
For roles that carry significant business responsibility, this distinction is the whole game. The cost of the wrong hire in a high-stakes client-facing role is not just a missed quota for a quarter - It plays out in relationships that do not develop, clients who leave, and productivity losses that compound over time. Getting those hiring decisions right, at scale, with consistency, requires methods that are built for predictive accuracy, not just candidate experience or hiring speed.
What this means for how organizations think about hiring
Most organizations are still optimizing the wrong things in their hiring process. They invest heavily in employer branding, application flow, and interview structure, all of which matter, but less in the core question: does our hiring process actually predict who will succeed in this role?
AI has sharpened the stakes here. If every candidate can present as polished and prepared, screening based on presentation becomes less useful. What holds up is direct observation of the behaviors that the job requires.
A few principles worth building from:
- Measure what the job requires, not what is easy to measure. Cognitive tests and personality questionnaires have their place, but they do not look much like the job. The closer the assessment is to the actual work, the better it predicts performance in it.
- Ask what your assessment predicts. Training completion? Retention? First-year output? Most organizations cannot answer that question today, largely because providers have rarely been asked to prove it. It is a fair thing to ask for.
- Take the human element seriously. In a simulation, a candidate is having a real conversation, responding in real time, navigating a situation that requires judgment. Even with the help of AI, that is hard to game. And it remains one of the strongest predictors of on-the-job performance available.
The data exists to make hiring decisions more accurate, fairer, and more directly tied to business outcomes. For organizations operating in high-stakes roles at scale, there is too much on the line to rely on methods that cannot hold up to that standard.
You may be interested in BTS’ thought leadership in the five talent shifts AI is forcing now.
La IA ya forma parte del día a día de las ventas. Hoy cualquier asesor puede llegar a una reunión con datos, tendencias e insights generados en segundos. Sin embargo, disponer de más información no garantiza conversaciones de mayor valor.
A través de una experiencia real con un consultor comercial, este artículo explica por qué la inteligencia artificial funciona como un GPS: ayuda a interpretar el entorno, pero no conduce la conversación ni entiende las prioridades del cliente.
En este artículo descubrirás:
- Por qué el acceso a la información ya no supone una ventaja competitiva.
- La importancia del business acumen para interpretar los datos con criterio.
- Cómo hablar el lenguaje del cliente genera credibilidad y diferenciación.
- Por qué las relaciones B2B evolucionan hacia relaciones P2P basadas en la confianza.
- Qué capacidades consultivas seguirán siendo exclusivamente humanas incluso en la era de la IA.
La tecnología seguirá evolucionando, pero la ventaja competitiva estará en quienes sean capaces de combinar inteligencia artificial con conversaciones centradas en el cliente, pensamiento estratégico y relaciones de largo plazo.