Tariffs are impacting strategic selling

Traditionally, Sales Kick-Offs (SKOs) were large, centralized gatherings, designed to align teams, spark momentum, and roll out the company’s go-to-market strategy. But as global businesses expanded, that one-size-fits-all approach began to show its limits.

Even before 2025, forward-thinking companies were experimenting with more localized formats to meet rising complexity and regional nuance. As international operations expanded, centralized SKOs began to strain under the weight of market variability, logistical challenges, and cultural differences. Regional activations emerged as a way to make strategy more relevant, and more actionable, at the local level.

Then came COVID-19. Travel restrictions, distributed teams, and new ways of working forced companies to reconsider the value, and feasibility, of large-scale gatherings. Virtual and regional alternatives emerged not just as stopgaps, but as smarter, faster, more focused activations.

That shift planted the seeds for what’s now taking hold: a hybrid model, where flagship events are amplified, not replaced, by a network of hyper-local strategy activations.

Why hyper-local SKOs have gained traction in 2025

Tighter budgets, tariff volatility, region-specific complexity, and faster-moving markets have made the traditional SKO model harder to justify, at least for now. But what’s emerging isn’t a downgrade. It’s a high-impact alternative built for today’s realities.

Hyper-local SKOs offer:

• Budget-conscious impact: Less spent on travel, more invested in enablement.
• Regional relevance: Local markets demand tailored approaches.
• Faster execution: Smaller events mean shorter planning cycles and more agility.
• Stronger engagement: Intimate settings foster real dialogue, trust, and retention.

Done right, hyper-local SKOs deliver sharper alignment, deeper enablement, and faster activation, without the logistical drag.

But this approach only works when it’s connected to something bigger:

• A clear, unifying story
• A strategy that flexes by region
• Tools and experiences that build competence, not just motivation

They’re not replacing the flagship event, they’re extending its reach, bringing strategy to life where performance happens in the field.

What to consider if you’re going local in 2026

1. Start with a unified strategy
   Without a cohesive message, fragmentation becomes a real risk. That’s why leading companies align early on messaging, strategic pillars, and storylines, then empower regional leaders to bring them to life in context.
   Centralized intent, decentralized delivery. That’s the sweet spot.
2. Use simulation and AI-enabled practice to scale what matters
   Smaller doesn’t mean shallower. Digital tools, like AI-powered practice platforms and immersive simulations, let teams stress-test decisions, sharpen skills, and internalize strategy.
   Instead of hearing strategy, reps experience it and leave ready to act.
3. Cut costs, without cutting connection
   The savings from reduced travel and venue spend are real, but the return comes from reinvesting in high-value enablement: stronger coaching, sharper content, localized insights, and sustained follow-through.
   Be thoughtful about how you redirect your budget. Spend to increase the outcome you desire.

1. Match the way your teams actually sell
   Modern GTM teams flex by region, segment, and product line. Hyper-local SKOs let teams focus on what’s actually happening in their markets.
   It’s not just about relevance, it’s about reps feeling seen and set up to win.
2. Create space for meaningful dialogue
   Large SKOs can default to performance over participation. Local formats flip the script. Smaller rooms enable deeper conversations and real-time alignment.
   Candor goes up. Trust goes up. Impact goes up.
3. Move faster, stay closer to the market
   Planning a traditional SKO can take six months or more. In a world where pricing shifts monthly and competition evolves weekly, that delay is a liability.
   Local events can launch quickly and adjust mid-stream, by design.
4. It’s not a replacement. It’s a complement.
   The flagship SKO still has value, especially to launch a new strategy or bring global teams together. But leading organizations are building a drumbeat of activation through local SKOs that reinforce, tailor, and sustain that initial momentum.
   Think about the tradeoffs and choose a flagship SKO versus localized experience based on the desired goal of the event.

Understand the risks and how to avoid them

Hyper-local SKOs bring opportunity, but also potential pitfalls if not well-integrated. Key risks include:

1. Fragmentation of message and priorities
   Without a strong central narrative, messaging drifts, and alignment erodes.
2. Uneven quality and experience
   When local teams aren’t equally equipped, outcomes vary. Some teams leave inspired. Others don’t.
3. Loss of cross-regional connection
   Flagship SKOs build culture through shared experience. Without intentional connection, silos can deepen.
4. Underinvestment in enablement
   If companies view local SKOs purely as cost-saving, they risk missing the moment to truly invest in seller capability.
5. Leadership misalignment
   If local and global leaders aren’t working from the same playbook, sellers get mixed messages, and lose confidence.

How to mitigate these risks:

• Anchor every SKO to a common strategic narrative
• Equip regional leaders with tools, training, and facilitation support
• Invest in shared enablement assets like simulations and AI tools
• Create cross-regional touchpoints to build culture and community
• Track impact and reinforce key messages over time

Finding new ways to perform and adapt

In a time of uncertainty, the best sales organizations aren’t pulling back on alignment, they’re finding new ways to deliver it.

Hyper-local SKOs offer a strategic evolution: reducing spend, increasing relevance, and accelerating execution.

It’s not just a budget decision.

It’s a better way to make what matters go further.

The question isn’t “What can we do with less?”

It’s “How do we get more out of every moment?”

We help teams follow mindful design principles for these strategic gatherings to drive purpose, ownership, personalization, and intention, delivering valuable experiences for your organization.Commercial kickoffs can be more than just celebration and education. Embedding strategy and change at scale requires a deliberate focus on these four critical elements: alignment, provocation, activation and celebration.

Traditionally, a commercial kickoff is a milestone event — part of a company’s DNA, and the place to reignite and recharge the field by celebrating accomplishments, driving excitement among sales reps, and building alignment around the organization’s future.

It provides an excellent opportunity for organizations to advance their objectives and strategic imperatives. Unfortunately, through our experience, these events often miss the mark in expectations from leadership, the field, and overall return on investment. We find that critical elements to plan and execute a commercial kickoff successfully are overlooked at some point during the process, creating friction among those responsible for planning and managing the event.

These three critical elements are: (1) ensuring alignment across relevant, diverse stakeholder groups, (2) maintaining a focus on the target audience, and (3) recognizing the impact of changes on event design. Attending to these elements ensures a balance between executing a memorable event, making the event relevant to the target audience, and driving business outcomes for the future.

Designing, developing, and executing a sales event: does this happen to you?

Typically, a commercial kickoff starts when a sales leader sees a need to celebrate accomplishments, drive excitement among sellers, and build alignment around the organization’s future. A committee is quickly assembled with representation from stakeholder groups such as marketing, sales enablement, and operations; they then develop a budget and announce the commercial kickoff, and everyone involved in planning quickly shifts into execution mode.

The committee comes up with a plan and assigns responsibilities. Committee members then go off on their own along with their respective teams, conducting periodic check-ins as a full committee to gauge progress. It quickly becomes apparent that groups are working in siloes with different priorities. For example, one group focuses on event program management, including venue choice or platform identification, event objectives, agenda, speakers, and communications. Other members of the commercial kickoff team are focused on content development.

Inevitably, something always happens that leads to minor and, in some cases, significant changes to the event. For example, sales leaders who are sponsoring the event are not always involved until a few weeks before, when they begin to realize that minor changes are necessary. However, there are other instances when organizations need to make drastic changes to their commercial kickoff plans. Whether adjusting for minor or significant changes, these changes lead to re-work, stress, and late nights for the people putting the event together – all major contributors to friction between team members and others in the organization. More alarming, these challenges can ultimately impact the ability to achieve the desired outcomes from a commercial kickoff.

There are three common mistakes organizations and planning committees make that lead to unnecessary friction when launching a commercial kickoff. By avoiding these mistakes, you will experience better planning, coordination, and alignment between sales leaders, marketing, event planning, sales enablement, and operations, which will help you achieve the desired business outcomes for your commercial kickoff.

Mistake 1

Planning is not aligned across all event stakeholders

Too often, planning efforts fail to consider competing stakeholder interests and perspectives that influence members of the planning committee as they develop an overall event plan.

• The Event Team wants attendees to remember the experience. Therefore, their priorities are the location (if in-person), the platform (if virtual), registration, and communications.
• Sales Enablement wants attendees to walk away better equipped to engage customers. Therefore, their priorities are breakout sessions that focus on tools and skill development.
• Product Marketing wants attendees to understand product and solution features and benefits, use cases, and “what’s new.” Therefore, their priority is education.
• Sales Leaders want attendees to leave inspired and motivated to execute the strategy. Therefore, their priorities are the main stage messaging and the overall vibe of the experience.

Solution

Ensuring alignment to the business objectives early in the process and understanding the critical decision points the team needs to make will reduce unnecessary friction throughout event planning and execution. Experience tells us that organizations with the most successful commercial kickoffs do the following:

• Align all vital stakeholders on goals or desired outcomes for the event.
• Solicit input from all stakeholders to identify themes.
• Maintain clarity on the red thread throughout the event.
• Coordinate planning and execution efforts by working as one unit, rather than in silos.

Mistake 2

Losing sight of what the target audience needs from the event

When balancing multiple perspectives and priorities, it can be easy to lose sight of what the target audience needs to get out of the event. While everything that an organization does is in service of customers, it is critical to keep in mind that commercial kickoffs are intended to serve the salesforce to help them do their best work serving customers. Traditionally, organizations have over-rotated on celebration, inspiration, and information-sharing during commercial kickoffs. However, these do not address sales reps’ comprehensive needs in today’s environment.

In reality, today’s sales reps struggle to achieve work-life balance because they are working longer days, jumping from meeting to meeting, experiencing less separation between work and home, and struggling to disconnect from work outside of working hours. Sales reps have demonstrated the prevailing feeling of being disconnected or isolated from their colleagues and their organizations. They are spending more time with their immediate families and re-evaluating what is important to them. It’s essential to recognize that some sales reps will decide whether or not to continue working for organizations after a commercial kickoff.

Solution

A concept called “everboarding” describes the notion that onboarding or activating customers never stops because products and services are ever-evolving. “Everboarding” is also applicable to your existing salesforce. Everboarding is informed by learning science – the realization that one-shot approaches like having a single day to onboard a new employee or share something new with employees in a single session will not endure. An everboarding strategy is a shift from sharing information during a single event to ongoing reinforcement. The organization, marketplace, and sellers constantly evolve, but teams are left to make sense of these changes. Successful organizations, particularly now, are taking the “everboarding” approach with their teams to continually engage and activate their team in the go-to-market strategy. A commercial kickoff represents an opportunity to engage participants in meaningful dialogue, workshop ideas, problem-solving, reflect, and plan intentional experiments in the field.

Mistake 3

Failing to recognize the impact of significant changes on the design of the event

There are external and internal events that can lead the team to reassess a commercial kickoff. With limited time to pull off a commercial kickoff event after any significant change, the team, including vendors, is thrust into action. Unfortunately, sometimes the group takes action without having a clear line of sight on the overall impact of their decision or based on incorrect assumptions. In these situations, stress builds, and missteps or errors become widespread.

Solution

Significant changes may require redesigning the event rather than simply adjusting or modifying sessions. There is a subtle difference between the two, but one that will determine the impact and effectiveness of the event. Given any significant changes, redesigning the event entails taking a step back and considering how you can best accomplish the event’s objectives. We know what you’re thinking – that you don’t have time for that, because the event is only weeks away – and we understand your urgency in these situations. However, taking the necessary actions early on will save you time, re-work, and overall frustration. Here are a few steps you can take to make the redesign work to your advantage:

• Quickly convince stakeholders to align the event’s objectives given a need to redesign and explore what needs adjusting given proposed changes.
• Evaluate the limitations of the platforms (registration, learning delivery, virtual event, etc.) that can materially impact achieving the objectives of the event.
• Redesign the event by considering the impact of the changes on the scope of the event (national, regional, or global), length of sessions, the balance between main stage and breakout sessions, strategies for participant engagement, speaker selection, and also the impact of the red thread throughout the event.

Conclusion

A commercial kickoff represents an excellent opportunity for organizations to acknowledge their sales force’s contributions and advance organizational objectives and strategic imperatives. However, it is also essential to balance executing a memorable event, making the event relevant to the intended audience, and driving business outcomes. To successfully plan and execute a commercial kickoff, event planners must not overlook the three most essential aspects to execute a commercial kickoff successfully: (1) ensuring alignment across relevant stakeholder groups, (2) maintaining a focus on the target audience, and (3) recognizing the impact of changes on event design. Ensuring that these elements are top-of-mind considerations throughout the commercial kickoff development journey will allow for a memorable event that’s relevant to the target audience and drives business outcomes for the future.

References

• Miller, R.C. (undated article). Commercial kickoffs: The Mistake You’re Making, https://www.forcemanagement.com/blog/mistake-youre-making-when-planning-your-sko
• Spotio (February 4, 2020). Guide to the Perfect Commercial kickoff Meeting, https://spotio.com/blog/sales-kickoff-meeting/ Pipedrive (updated blog post). Commercial kickoff: How to Start the New Year with a Bang, https://spotio.com/blog/sales-kickoff-meeting/
• Robinson, R (updated blog post). 12 commercial kickoff meeting strategies and best practices for bringing your team together https://blog.close.com/sales-kickoff-meeting/
• Wang, E. (November 17, 2020). Everboarding is the next level of customer onboarding, https://medium.com/bento-app/everboarding-is-the-next-level-of-customer-onboarding-6aa52e2595d8

Each business revolution has reshaped not only how businesses operate, but how they organize themselves and empower their people. From the industrial age to the information era, and now into the age of artificial intelligence, technology has always brought with it a reconfiguration of authority, capability, and judgment.

In the 19th century, industrialization centralized work and knowledge. The factory system required hierarchical structures where strategy, information, and decision-making were concentrated at the top. Managers at the apex made tradeoffs for the greater good of the enterprise because they were the only ones with access to the full picture.

Then came the information economy. With it came the distribution of information and a need for more agile, team-based structures. Cross-functional collaboration and customer proximity became competitive necessities. Organizations flattened, experimented with matrix models, and pushed decision-making closer to where problems were being solved. What had once been the purview of a select few, judgment, strategic tradeoffs, and insight became expected competencies for managers and team leads across the enterprise.

Now, AI is changing the game again. But this time, it’s not just about access to data. It’s about access to intelligence.

Generative AI democratizes access not only to information, but to intelligent output. That shifts the burden for humans from producing insights to evaluating them. Judgment, which was long the domain of a few executives, must now become a baseline competency for the many across the organization.

But here’s the paradox: while AI extends our capacity for intelligence, discernment, the human ability to weigh context, values, and consequence, is still best left in the hands of human leaders. As organizations begin to automate early-career work, they may inadvertently erase the very pathways and opportunities by which judgment was built.

Why judgment matters more than ever

Deloitte’s 2023 Human Capital Trends survey found that 85% of leaders believe independent decision-making is more important than ever, but only 26% say they’re ready to support it. That shortfall threatens to neutralize the very productivity gains AI promises.

If employees can’t question, challenge, or contextualize AI’s output, then intelligent tools become dangerous shortcuts. The organization stalls, not from a lack of answers, but from a lack of sense-making.

What organizations must do

To stay competitive, organizations must shift from simply adopting AI to designing AI-aware ways of working:

• Build new learning paths for judgment development. As AI replaces easily systematized tasks, companies must replace lost learning experiences with mentorship, simulations, and intentional development planning.

• Design workflows that require human input. Treat AI as a co-pilot, not an autopilot. Embed review checkpoints and tradeoff discussions. Just as innovation processes have stage gates, so should AI analyses.

• Make judgment measurable. Assess and develop decision-making under ambiguity from entry-level roles onward. Research shows the best learning strategy for this is high-fidelity simulations.

• Start earlier. Leadership development must begin far earlier in career paths, because judgment, not just knowledge, is the new differentiator.

What’s emerging is not just a flatter hierarchy, but a more distributed sense of judgment responsibility. To thrive, organizations must prepare their people not to outthink AI, but to out-judge it.

P R E S S R E L E A S E
Stockholm, May 5, 2025

STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN – BTS Group AB (publ), a leading global consultancy specializing in strategy execution, change, and people development, has agreed to acquire Nexo Pesquisa e Consultoria Ltda., Nexo, a boutique consulting firm headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil.

Nexo has been growing continuously since it was founded in 2017. With revenues of approximately 12 million Brazilian Reales (approx. 2.1 million USD) in 2024, and a highly capable team of 21 members, Nexo has built a strong reputation for delivering transformative projects in strategy, innovation, leadership, and culture.

Nexo collaborates with a great portfolio of clients across sectors such as financial services, consumer goods, and technology, assisting both local and global companies in navigating uncertainty, unlocking creativity, and activating strategy through people. Their work encompasses culture transformation, leadership development, employer value proposition, innovation culture, and vision alignment – supported by proprietary methodologies and frameworks.

BTS currently operates in Brazil servicing both local and multinational clients with a team of 13 employees. By acquiring Nexo, BTS not only increases the Group’s footprint in Brazil but also adds significant capabilities in culture and transformation services. Nexo’s client base has limited overlap with BTS, creating strong growth potential and synergy opportunities.

“Nexo is known for helping leaders and organizations tackle some of the most complex, human-centered challenges with creativity, empathy, and strategic clarity and the Nexo team is loved by their clients,” says Philios Andreou, Deputy CEO of BTS Group and President of the Other Markets Unit. “Their products and services complement and elevate our existing offerings, especially in culture transformation, and we are thrilled to welcome the Nexo team to BTS.”

“We’re excited to join BTS. We’ve long admired BTS’s approach and unique portfolio to support large organizations and leaders in connecting strategy with culture across the organization,” says Andreas Auerbach, co founder of Nexo. “Becoming part of BTS, allows us to scale our impact and bring more value to our clients while staying true to our values and culture,” adds Mariana Lage Andrade, co-founder of Nexo.

Upon completion of the transaction, Nexo’s business and organization will merge with BTS Brazil. Nexo’s founders will assume senior management roles in the joint operation.

The acquisition includes a limited initial cash consideration. Additional purchase price considerations will be paid between 2026 and 2028, provided Nexo meets specific performance targets. A limited portion of any such additional purchase price considerations will be paid in newly issued BTS shares. The transaction is effective immediately.

BTS’s acquisition strategy continues to focus on broadening our service portfolio, expanding our geographic reach, and enhancing our capabilities to support future organic growth in a fragmented market.

For more information, please contact:
Philios Andreou
Deputy CEO
BTS Group AB
philios.andreou@bts.com

Michael Wallin
Head of investor relations
BTS Group AB
michael.wallin@bts.com
+46-8-587 070 02
+46-708-78 80 19

‍

Work today is too complex for individuals to succeed in isolation. Almost every critical decision, innovation, or transformation depends on teams working effectively together. Leaders rely on their teams to deliver results. Teams, in turn, rely on their leaders to create the conditions where performance is possible. This exchange, what leaders need from their teams, and what teams need from their leaders, sits at the heart of what we call teaming.

When teaming is strong, leaders get what they need from their teams [creativity, resilience, execution] and teams get what they need from leaders [direction, support, and the conditions to thrive]. It’s how strategy becomes action, how uncertainty becomes opportunity, and how businesses stay competitive in a fast-changing world.